Getting started with the collection:
Een zittende hond, zich ontlastend, van voren gezien
Frans Snijders, 1589 - 1657
- Artwork typedrawing
- Object numberRP-T-1900-A-4450
- Dimensionsheight 164 mm x width 167 mm
- Physical characteristicszwart en wit krijt op lichtbruin getint papier
Discover more
Identification
Title(s)
Een zittende hond, zich ontlastend, van voren gezien
Object type
Object number
RP-T-1900-A-4450
Creation
Creation
draftsman (artist): Frans Snijders
Dating
1589 - 1657
Search further with
Material and technique
Physical description
zwart en wit krijt op lichtbruin getint papier
Dimensions
height 164 mm x width 167 mm
This work is about
Subject
Acquisition and rights
Acquisition
purchase 1900-05-31
Copyright
Persistent URL
To refer to this object, please use the following persistent URL:
Questions?
Do you spot a mistake? Or do you have information about the object? Let us know!
Ludolf de Jongh
Defecating Greyhound, Front View
? Rotterdam, c. 1644
Inscriptions
inscribed on verso: upper centre, in a nineteenth-century hand, in pencil, 6
stamped on verso: lower centre, with the mark of the museum (L. 2228a)
Technical notes
watermark: Strasbourg lily (lower half); cf. Heawood, no. 1730 (Amsterdam: 1646)
Provenance
…; sale, Abraham Nicolaas Godefroy (1822-99, Amsterdam) et al., Amsterdam (De Vries), 8 May 1900 sqq., in no. 253 (as by ‘F. Snijders’), with twelve other drawings, fl. 19, to the dealer F. Muller, Amsterdam;1Copy RKD. from whom, with twelve other drawings, fl. 22.40, to the museum (L. 2228a), 1900
Object number: RP-T-1900-A-4450
The artist
Biography
Ludolf de Jongh (Overschie (Rotterdam) 1616 – 1679 Hillegersberg (Rotterdam))
He was the eldest son of Leendert Leendertsz. de Jongh (1590-c. 1657), a shoemaker and innkeeper in Rotterdam, and his wife, Annetje Leuvens (?-1647). According to Houbraken, Ludolf started his artistic training around 1627 in the workshop of his fellow townsman Cornelis Saftleven (1607-1681). He then moved to Delft to study with Anthonie Palamedesz (1602-1673), before settling in Utrecht, to work in the studio of Jan van Bijlert (c. 1597/98-1671). Houbraken subsequently placed the artist in Paris, where he reportedly stayed from 1635 to 1642. After his return, De Jongh established himself in Rotterdam as a portraitist and genre painter. In 1646 he married Adriana Pietersdr. Montagne (?-1697). In 1652 he was appointed major to the city’s militia company and in 1665 the artist moved to nearby Hillegersberg, where he was appointed bailiff. On his death, De Jongh left a considerable fortune, testifying to his successful career.2R.E. Fleischer, ‘Ludolf (Leuff) de Jongh (2003), Grove Art Online, https://doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T045121; accessed 31-05-2021.
De Jongh’s earliest known works, dating from around 1642, strongly reflect the style of his teacher, Palamedesz. Throughout his later career, however, De Jongh employed a large variety of artistic styles and worked across several genres. Apart from portraiture, his painted oeuvre consists of genre scenes of both domestic and soldier life, panoramic landscapes with elegant hunting parties, as well as paintings of historical subjects.3Ibid.; R.E. Fleischer, Ludolf de Jongh (1616-1679): Painter of Rotterdam, Doornspijk 1989 (Ars Picturae, no. 1), pp. 83-85.
This artistic and stylistic versatility may be explained by the fact that Rotterdam never was a major centre of artistic patronage, and painters thus were less obliged to conform to a particular style or to specialize to meet competition; instead they could expand into a wider range of subject-matter.4R.E. Fleischer and S. Reiss, ‘Attributions to Ludolf de Jongh: Some Old, Some New’, Burlington Magazine 135 (1993), no. 1087, p. 668. Given De Jongh’s artistic breadth and the fact that few of his paintings are signed, his works have often been misattributed to artists of greater renown, such as Bartholomeus van der Helst (1613-1670), Gerard ter Borch (1617-1681) or Pieter de Hooch (1629-c. 1679/99). His genre scenes show close affinity to corps de garde painters, such as Simon Kick (1603-1653) and Pieter Codde (1599-1678). Equally apparent is the influence of Cornelis Saftleven, Abraham Diepraam (1622-1690) and Willem Kalf (1619-1693) as representatives of the typical Rotterdam tradition of farmers’ interiors. His elegant landscapes with figures, in turn, are reminiscent of Italianate painters such as Jan Both (c. 1615/22-1652) and Herman van Swanevelt (c. 1603-1655).5F. Scholten, ‘Review of R.E. Fleischer, Ludolf de Jongh (1616-1679): Painter of Rotterdam’, Oud Holland 106 (1992) no. 1, pp. 50-51. De Jongh may have met Swanevelt during his stay in Paris.
The same attribution issues apply to De Jongh’s drawn oeuvre. Schatborn, in his article on the artist’s figure studies, convincingly established his authorship of several chalk drawings by linking them to figural motifs in De Jongh’s signed paintings and drew attention to the strong stylistic affinity with the work of Cornelis Saftleven.6P. Schatborn, ‘Figuurstudies van Ludolf de Jongh’, Oud-Holland 89 (1975), pp. 79-82.. This process was recently repeated by Stefes for a large group of chalk studies of greyhounds related to hunting scenes.7 A. Stefes, ‘Dogs by the Dozen: New Attributions to Ludolf de Jongh’, _ Master Drawings_ 60 (2022), no. 1, pp. 69-73. De Jongh would have kept such figure and animal studies as study material to incorporate as staffage in his landscapes and interiors.
Saskia van Altena, 2021
References
A. Houbraken, De groote schouburgh der Nederlantsche konstschilders en schilderessen, 3 vols., Amsterdam 1718-21, II (1719), pp. 33-34; A. von Wurzbach, Niederländisches Künstlerlexikon, 3 vols., Vienna/Leipzig 1906-11, I (1906), p. 762; U. Thieme and F. Becker, Allgemeines Lexikon der bildenden Künstler: Von der Antike bis zur Gegenwart, 37 vols., Leipzig 1907-50, XIX (1926), pp. 132-34; P. Haverkorn van Rijsewijk, ‘Ludolf (Leuff) de Jongh’, Oud-Holland 14 (1896), pp. 36-46; P. Schatborn, ‘Figuurstudies van Ludolf de Jongh’, Oud-Holland 89 (1975), pp. 79-85; R.E. Fleischer, ‘Ludolf de Jongh and the Early Work of Pieter de Hooch’, Oud-Holland 92 (1978), pp. 49-67; R.E. Fleischer, Ludolf de Jongh (1616-1679): Painter of Rotterdam, Doornspijk 1989 (Ars Picturae, no. 1); F. Scholten, ‘Review of R.E. Fleischer, Ludolf de Jongh (1616-1679): Painter of Rotterdam’, Oud Holland 106 (1992) no. 1, pp. 49-54; R.E. Fleischer and S. Reiss, ‘Attributions to Ludolf de Jongh: Some Old, Some New’, Burlington Magazine 135 (1993), no. 1087, pp. 668-77; R.E. Fleischer, ‘Ludolf (Leuff) de Jongh (2003), Grove Art Online, https://doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T045121; accessed 31-05-2021; A. Stefes, ‘Dogs by the Dozen: New Attributions to Ludolf de Jongh’, Master Drawings 60 (2022), no. 1, pp. 69-73; https://rkd.nl/explore/artists/42770
Entry
The present sheet belongs to a group of twelve studies of dogs, with one exception drawn in black and white chalk on toned paper (inv. nos. [RP-T-1900-A-4451] to [RP-T-1900-A-4461] and [RP-T-00-442]). They were offered in the 1900 Godefroy sale as by Frans Snijders (1579-1657) and were inventoried under that name. Robels, in 1989, accepted this attribution.8H. Robels, Frans Snyders: Stilleben- und Tiermaler (1579-1658), Munich 1989, pp. 420-21, nos. Z 63-74. Inv. no. RP-T-00-442, inventoried only in the 1970s, apparently escaped her attention.
However, this global attribution, including inv. no. [RP-T-1900-A-4456], on blue paper and clearly by another hand, was apparently based on the mere fact that dogs feature prominently in the oeuvre of the Flemish artist. The drawings, however, are neither linked by motif to any painting by Snijders, nor is there a stylistic connection to his few black-and-white chalk studies, such as Study of a Dog Thrown on its Back in the British Museum, London (inv. no. Oo,9.38),9Ibid., no. Z 50. or Howling Dog Lying on the Ground, in the Courtauld Gallery, London (inv. no. D.1952.RW.2924).10Ibid., no. Z 52. (Snijders mostly used pen and brown ink for his drawings, and his dogs – both painted and drawn – are almost always shown in action.)
An alternative attribution to Ludolf de Jongh was first suggested by the present writer (2011), based on two similar studies of greyhounds in the same technique in the Hamburger Kunsthalle, Hamburg, traditionally given to that artist (inv. nos. 22867 and 22868).11A. Stefes, Niederländische Zeichnungen, 1450-1800, 3 vols., coll. cat. Hamburg 2011 (Die Sammlungen der Hamburger Kunsthalle, Kupferstichkabinett, vol. 2), I, nos. 488-89. This attribution can be verified by the fact that several of the Amsterdam studies are closely related to details in paintings by the artist. The related study of a defecating greyhound (inv. no. [RP-T-1900-A-4452], for instance, is similar to one that appears in the foreground of an untraced painted Small Hunting Group of circa 1655,12Cf. R.E. Fleischer, Ludolf de Jongh (1616-1679): Painter of Rotterdam, Doornspijk 1989, p. 52 (fig. 48). Several of the dozen Rijksmuseum studies appear to have been made from life after the same dog, the artist evidently trying to capture his subject from different perspectives. A lost study of the same model seems to have served for the defecating greyhound in Hunters in the Field, formerly in the Cees Roodenburg collection, Schiedam.13Ibid., p. 50, fig. 44; sale, Amsterdam (Christie’s), 24 May 2016, no. 98. The fact that inv. no. [RP-T-1900-A-4455] is linked to another untraced painting by De Jongh, Landscape with Diana and her Nymphs, this one from 1644,14Ibid., p. 4 (fig. 31); sale, Amsterdam (Christie’s), 9 November-15 December 2010, no. 114. suggests that the whole group may have been done in the mid-1640s and kept by De Jongh for future study material and incorporation into works from the 1650s.
As a draughtsman, Ludolf de Jongh was previously known mostly for figure studies related to his paintings.15Cf. P. Schatborn, ‘Figuurstudies van Ludolf de Jongh’, Oud Holland 89 (1975), no. 2, pp. 79-85; P. Schatborn Dutch Figure Drawings from the Seventeenth Century, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksprentenkabinet)/Washington (DC) (National Gallery of Art) 1981-82, pp. 77, 138; R.E. Fleischer and S. Reiss, ‘Attributions to Ludolf de Jongh: Some Old, Some New’, Burlington Magazine 135 (1993), no. 1087, pp. 668-70; P. Schatborn and L. van Sloten, Old Drawings, New Names: Rembrandt and his Contemporaries, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Museum Het Rembrandthuis) 2014, pp. 147-49. Some of these were also done on toned paper, such as the Violin Player (c. 1652) in the Albertina, Vienna (inv. no. 8743).16R.E. Fleischer and S. Reiss, ‘Attributions to Ludolf de Jongh: Some Old, Some New’, Burlington Magazine 135 (1993), no. 1087, p. 671 (fig. 7). With at least twelve dog studies now securely attributed to him, De Jongh’s drawn oeuvre is considerably enlarged and enriched in subject-matter. Before 2011, only one animal study was given to the artist, an oil sketch of a Reclining Dog in the Amsterdam Museum (inv. no. TA 10322),17Cf. M.C. Plomp, ‘Drawing and Printmaking in Delft during the Seventeenth Century’, in W. Liedtke et al., Vermeer and the Delft School, exh. cat. New York (Metropolitan Museum of Art)/London (National Gallery) 2001, pp. 182-83 (fig. 198). a motif that appears in De Jongh’s painting Travellers Resting on a Road.18Sale, London (Christie’s), 11 December 2002, no. 67; R.E. Fleischer and S. Reiss, ‘Attributions to Ludolf de Jongh: Some Old, Some New’, Burlington Magazine 135 (1993), no. 1087, p. 670 (fig. 5). The same dog also occurs in an untraced painting with a fragmented signature of Hendrick Verschuring (1627-1690), which was formerly on the London art market.19Cf. B.P.J. Broos and M. Schapelhouman, Nederlandse tekenaars geboren tussen 1600 en 1660, coll. cat. Amsterdam 1993 (Oude tekeningen in het bezit van het Amsterdams Historisch Museum, waaronder de collective Fodor, vol. 4), p. 205 (figs. a-b). For that reason, Schapelhouman gave the oil sketch to Verschuring, but according to Plomp20‘Drawing and Printmaking in Delft during the Seventeenth Century’, in W. Liedtke et al., Vermeer and the Delft School, exh. cat. New York (Metropolitan Museum of Art)/London (National Gallery) 2001, p. 584, n. 45. that second painting is also by De Jongh.
Annemarie Stefes, 2021
Literature
H. Robels,_Frans Snyders: Stilleben- und Tiermaler (1579-1658), Munich 1989, no. Z 70 (as by Snijders); A. Stefes, ‘Dogs by the Dozen: New Attributions to Ludolf de Jongh’, _ Master Drawings_ 60 (2022), no. 1, p. 69, fig. 1
Citation
A. Stefes, 2021, 'Ludolf de Jongh, _, Rotterdam, c. 1644', in J. Turner (ed.), _Dutch Drawings of the Seventeenth Century in the Rijksmuseum, online coll. cat. Amsterdam: https://data.rijksmuseum.nl/20012350
(accessed 13 augustus 2026 22:16:06 UTC+0).Footnotes
- 1Copy RKD.
- 2R.E. Fleischer, ‘Ludolf (Leuff) de Jongh (2003), Grove Art Online, https://doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.T045121; accessed 31-05-2021.
- 3Ibid.; R.E. Fleischer, Ludolf de Jongh (1616-1679): Painter of Rotterdam, Doornspijk 1989 (Ars Picturae, no. 1), pp. 83-85.
- 4R.E. Fleischer and S. Reiss, ‘Attributions to Ludolf de Jongh: Some Old, Some New’, Burlington Magazine 135 (1993), no. 1087, p. 668.
- 5F. Scholten, ‘Review of R.E. Fleischer, Ludolf de Jongh (1616-1679): Painter of Rotterdam’, Oud Holland 106 (1992) no. 1, pp. 50-51. De Jongh may have met Swanevelt during his stay in Paris.
- 6P. Schatborn, ‘Figuurstudies van Ludolf de Jongh’, Oud-Holland 89 (1975), pp. 79-82.
- 7A. Stefes, ‘Dogs by the Dozen: New Attributions to Ludolf de Jongh’, _ Master Drawings_ 60 (2022), no. 1, pp. 69-73.
- 8H. Robels, Frans Snyders: Stilleben- und Tiermaler (1579-1658), Munich 1989, pp. 420-21, nos. Z 63-74. Inv. no. RP-T-00-442, inventoried only in the 1970s, apparently escaped her attention.
- 9Ibid., no. Z 50.
- 10Ibid., no. Z 52.
- 11A. Stefes, Niederländische Zeichnungen, 1450-1800, 3 vols., coll. cat. Hamburg 2011 (Die Sammlungen der Hamburger Kunsthalle, Kupferstichkabinett, vol. 2), I, nos. 488-89.
- 12Cf. R.E. Fleischer, Ludolf de Jongh (1616-1679): Painter of Rotterdam, Doornspijk 1989, p. 52 (fig. 48).
- 13Ibid., p. 50, fig. 44; sale, Amsterdam (Christie’s), 24 May 2016, no. 98.
- 14Ibid., p. 4 (fig. 31); sale, Amsterdam (Christie’s), 9 November-15 December 2010, no. 114.
- 15Cf. P. Schatborn, ‘Figuurstudies van Ludolf de Jongh’, Oud Holland 89 (1975), no. 2, pp. 79-85; P. Schatborn Dutch Figure Drawings from the Seventeenth Century, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Rijksprentenkabinet)/Washington (DC) (National Gallery of Art) 1981-82, pp. 77, 138; R.E. Fleischer and S. Reiss, ‘Attributions to Ludolf de Jongh: Some Old, Some New’, Burlington Magazine 135 (1993), no. 1087, pp. 668-70; P. Schatborn and L. van Sloten, Old Drawings, New Names: Rembrandt and his Contemporaries, exh. cat. Amsterdam (Museum Het Rembrandthuis) 2014, pp. 147-49.
- 16R.E. Fleischer and S. Reiss, ‘Attributions to Ludolf de Jongh: Some Old, Some New’, Burlington Magazine 135 (1993), no. 1087, p. 671 (fig. 7).
- 17Cf. M.C. Plomp, ‘Drawing and Printmaking in Delft during the Seventeenth Century’, in W. Liedtke et al., Vermeer and the Delft School, exh. cat. New York (Metropolitan Museum of Art)/London (National Gallery) 2001, pp. 182-83 (fig. 198).
- 18Sale, London (Christie’s), 11 December 2002, no. 67; R.E. Fleischer and S. Reiss, ‘Attributions to Ludolf de Jongh: Some Old, Some New’, Burlington Magazine 135 (1993), no. 1087, p. 670 (fig. 5).
- 19Cf. B.P.J. Broos and M. Schapelhouman, Nederlandse tekenaars geboren tussen 1600 en 1660, coll. cat. Amsterdam 1993 (Oude tekeningen in het bezit van het Amsterdams Historisch Museum, waaronder de collective Fodor, vol. 4), p. 205 (figs. a-b).
- 20‘Drawing and Printmaking in Delft during the Seventeenth Century’, in W. Liedtke et al., Vermeer and the Delft School, exh. cat. New York (Metropolitan Museum of Art)/London (National Gallery) 2001, p. 584, n. 45.











